你们难以置信,对特殊教育的孩子、我们学区有些要送到外区去教育、每个孩子每天光交通费是$400!
理由是特殊教育的孩子、或者有残疾的孩子,他们的车子是不一样的、要特殊装备, 每个校车只能载少数几个孩子去不同的特殊学校
家长没有义务送孩子、学校如果哪天有司机不能上班要摆脱家长自己送、那么学校要赔付家长的,这个费用也不低
版主: resso
I believe the US has spent way too much on special education, and the result is minimal.
fortyNiner 写了: ↑11 1月 2024, 19:09I believe the US has spent way too much on special education, and the result is minimal.
way too much until one of your kids needs it...just saying...but I can understand where you are coming from.
老牛想最大的result就是美国人民敢生。没有国家包底要是生了残疾儿童咋办。
学龄时期学区支出还是小头。那些需要照顾一辈子的才是大头。
说到底,他们都是生而美国公民。
fortyNiner 写了: ↑11 1月 2024, 19:09I believe the US has spent way too much on special education, and the result is minimal.
Of course, your butts determine your position. That's true for most people.
I agree that we need to take care of them. I even agree that we can spend twice as much on them as on an average kid, but how much has been spent on them per student? Five times? Ten times? That's too egregious.
yoyo6713 写了: ↑11 1月 2024, 19:23fortyNiner 写了: ↑11 1月 2024, 19:09I believe the US has spent way too much on special education, and the result is minimal.
way too much until one of your kids needs it...just saying...but I can understand where you are coming from.
I was not saying not to take care of them, I meant money could be spent in more productive ways.
Why do we want to spend so much on them for almost no result? Why not use the money on them later to help them on something else?
牛河梁 写了: ↑11 1月 2024, 20:30老牛想最大的result就是美国人民敢生。没有国家包底要是生了残疾儿童咋办。
学龄时期学区支出还是小头。那些需要照顾一辈子的才是大头。
说到底,他们都是生而美国公民。
fortyNiner 写了: ↑11 1月 2024, 19:09I believe the US has spent way too much on special education, and the result is minimal.