川普1/6事件有罪吗

[fortyNiner]

He knew what would happen. So adding "peacefully" in his incitement was just to cover his ass.
If you knew A is looking for and to kill B, and you tell A that B is in Room 1000 and also tell him to talk to B "peacefully", you are still guilty.

fortyNinier: 煽动暴民攻击国会有罪
Exactly. He did NOT do that. He urged the crowd to march "peacefully".

shanghaibaba: 你说老川看电视的场景，我没看到，不清楚。如果有，如果换了你，感觉大选被盗，一肚子委屈，会不会有那么一丝蔚籍，会不会有表情流露？你拿这个定罪，太可笑了吧？更何况他后来出来公开发话让民众回家。Again, 国会山事件绝非偶然。手法和香港如出一辙的假旗。同期类似的选举悲剧在巴西也上演。这是民主的悲剧。

Agree.
And I believe 煽动暴民攻击国会有罪, so he is guilty.

[Lilyamao]

川普凭什么认为大选被盗？每个失败的总统候选人都来这么一出、美国人还能选举吗？

就凭他无中生有说大选被盗，就该送精神病院去了

[fortyNiner]

Nonexistent basis? Those stuff I saw on TV were fake?

Again, you are basing you calling on a nonexistent basis. Jan 6 was meant to be a peaceful gathering. According to capital staff, majority of the people who entered the building were well behaved. There was no vandalism, no violence, no destroying of properties. Some people were searching for some papers. Those few instigators were the key component of the Jan 6 events and that's what the focus of investigation should focus on.

He knew what would happen. So adding "peacefully" in his incitement was just to cover his ass.
If you knew A is looking for and to kill B, and you tell A that B is in Room 1000 and also tell him to talk to B "peacefully", you are still guilty.

[fortyNiner]

News on 1/6 and the days after.

What genre?

Nonexistent basis? Those stuff I saw on TV were fake?

[grasshopper]

Innocent until proven guilty

[Topgolf118]

他那些言论，有一些道德责任。但说要定罪，那肯定是不够。

[who]

他那些言论，有一些道德责任。但说要定罪，那肯定是不够。

那不是一个普通人，是美国总统啊，有几千万的忠实支持者。

[Topgolf118]

他那些言论，有一些道德责任。但说要定罪，那肯定是不够。

那不是一个普通人，是美国总统啊，有几千万的忠实支持者。

他不是一个普通的美国总统。