Breaking: 高院决定科罗拉多州不可以决定kick Trump off the ballot

[Lilyamao]

原话是州不可以决定，只有congress 可以决定老川1/6是否叛国

所以高院把自己也撇清了、就是他们也不会来决定

但是国会不敢投票的、理由是，谁敢啊、民主党是有213票，但是这个ruling 好像要2/3参院票，共和党议员谁敢站在反方？真的会被愤怒川粉暗杀

虽然这是个意料之中的决定、但是依然有些失落

[Lilyamao]

高院就是决定他们尸位素餐，川普有没有煽动叛乱、他们法律不来决定、搞笑吧

[Lilyamao]

也就是说总统是不是违宪，高院不判决，这个基本上也堵死了联邦法官判川普1/6违宪的可能性

[delicacy]

死了人的，已经不能算和平了。

[牛大春]

Supreme Court doesn't address whether Trump is an "insurrectionist"
From CNN’s John Fritze

Monday’s Supreme Court opinion doesn’t directly address whether former President Donald Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, qualified him as an “insurrectionist” – skirting an issue that the courts in Colorado had wrestled with.

The unsigned opinion noted that lower courts in Colorado found Trump’s remarks before the attack on the US Capitol qualified as engaging in an insurrection within the meaning of the Constitution. But the US Supreme Court’s opinion didn’t return to that judgment.

That tracks with what experts predicted would happen: that the justices would seek to decide the Trump ballot case in a narrow way without delving into Trump’s actions.

[fortyNiner]

Just as many people expected.
SCOTUS would rather leave it to voters to decide.