让美国再度伟大

[shepherd17]

万能的 AI 啊，告诉我如何让美国再度伟大？

特朗普版本

在 2024 年大选之后，政府开始实施一系列以国内复兴为目标的优先事项：
能源主导地位: 通过撤销以气候为中心的限制、简化许可流程，并退出《巴黎气候协定》，以释放美国能源潜力并降低消费者成本。
政府改革 (DOGE): 利用“政府效率部”冻结官僚体系的招聘、削减“无用”法规，并要求联邦雇员恢复线下办公。
经济保护主义: 推行“美国优先”的贸易政策，包括关税措施和与中国重新谈判贸易条款，以激励国内制造业。
让美国再次健康 (MAHA): 逐步淘汰人工食用色素、在学校恢复全脂牛奶供应，并将大麻重新归类为附表 III 级，以加速医学研究。
边境安全: 优先推进大规模驱逐行动，并严格执行移民法律，以保护国内劳动力市场。

---

替代版本

政策专家和批评者认为，真正的国家强盛需要一套基础性投资：
创新与生产力: 通过在人工智能、半导体和量子计算领域开展“极速”项目来提升生产力，而不是仅依赖传统产业。
人力资本: 投资公平的学校经费和职业培训，以确保劳动力在先进制造业中保持竞争力。
医疗改革: 转向更高效的医疗模式，以降低家庭和企业的成本。
基础设施: 现代化陈旧的交通和数字网络，以支撑 21 世纪的经济。

---

The Trump-Vance Administration Vision (2025–2026)

Following the 2024 election, the administration has implemented a series of priorities aimed at domestic renewal:
Energy Dominance: Unleashing American energy by reversing climate-focused restrictions, streamlining permits, and withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord to reduce consumer costs.
Government Reform (DOGE): Utilizing the Department of Government Efficiency to freeze bureaucratic hiring, cut "useless" regulations, and mandate that federal employees return to in-person work.
Economic Protectionism: Implementing "America First" trade policies, including tariffs and renegotiated terms with China, to incentivize domestic manufacturing.
Make America Healthy Again (MAHA): Phasing out artificial food dyes, restoring whole milk in schools, and reclassifying marijuana to Schedule III to accelerate medical research.
Border Security: Prioritizing mass deportations and strict enforcement of immigration laws to protect the domestic labor market.

---

Alternative Economic and Social Perspectives

Policy experts and critics argue that true greatness requires a different set of foundational investments:
Innovation and Productivity: Accelerating productivity through "warp speed" projects in AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, rather than relying solely on traditional industry.
Human Capital: Investing in equitable school financing and vocational training to ensure the workforce is competitive in advanced manufacturing.
Healthcare Reform: Transitioning to more efficient healthcare models to lower costs for families and businesses.
Infrastructure: Modernizing outdated transportation and digital networks to support a 21st-century economy.
Historical and Cultural Context
The phrase has deep roots in American politics, originally popularized by Ronald Reagan in 1980 during a period of stagflation. In 2026, the MAGA movement is increasingly focused on a "cultural reclamation," seeking to restore traditional values in national symbols, sports, and education.

[shepherd17]

请 AI 告诉我，特朗普能领导美国再度走向伟大吗？

支持者的观点

支持者认为，特朗普在经济、边境和外交政策上优先推行“美国优先”，兑现了自己的承诺。
经济复兴: 政府声称已实现创纪录的能源产量，并让数万亿美元的投资回流美国。特朗普坚持认为，他将关税作为产业工具的做法正在让国家“繁荣”，并成为世界上“最火热”的经济体。
边境安全: 政府强调在 2025 年实现了净移民为负，扭转了长达 50 年的趋势，从而重新掌控移民流动。
军事力量与和平: 支持者指出，政府进行了数十年来最大规模的军事投资，并促成多场战争的和平协议，作为美国全球实力恢复的证据。
政府改革: 通过“政府效率部”（DOGE），政府声称已发现 1600 亿美元的浪费，并开始对联邦官僚体系进行大规模削减。

---

反对论点 (批评者的观点）

批评者认为，特朗普的政策削弱了美国伟大的根基，包括民主制度、国际联盟和经济稳定。
经济风险: 经济学家警告，大规模关税可能导致更高的通胀、更慢的就业增长，并在 2026 年让美国家庭平均每年多支出 2400 美元。
社会与民主担忧: 许多人认为“让美国再次伟大”是一句倒退的口号，忽视了弱势群体的权利，并威胁拆解民主规范。
国际孤立: 批评者认为，退出《巴黎气候协定》等国际协议、疏远北约盟友，会让美国在国际事务中成为“被孤立者”。
环境与科学影响: 对科研的巨大削减以及环境法规的回撤，被一些人视为对美国创新能力和生态健康的长期威胁。

---

“伟大”的主观性

“MAGA”议程的成效往往取决于人们如何定义“伟大”的时代。
历史参照: 有些人将这一口号与二战后的经济繁荣或 1980 年代联系在一起；也有人认为它指向一个“神话般的过去”，那个时代尚未出现现代民权或环境保护。
结果导向的视角: 特朗普本人表示，最终的检验不是口号，而是结果，并指出美国人民“必须切身感受到”，承诺才算兑现。

---

Arguments for Success (Supporters' View)

Supporters argue that Trump is fulfilling his promise by prioritizing "America First" across economic, border, and foreign policy.
Economic Restoration: The administration claims to have achieved record energy production and reshored trillions in investments. Trump maintains that his use of tariffs as an industrial tool is making the country "boom" and become the "hottest" economy in the world.
Border Security: The administration highlights achieving negative net migration in 2025, reversing a 50-year trend to restore control over immigration flows.
Military Strength and Peace: Proponents point to the largest military investment in decades and the brokering of peace deals to end multiple wars as evidence of restored global strength.
Government Reform: Through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the administration claims to have identified $160 billion in waste and begun massive cuts to federal bureaucracy.

---

Arguments Against (Critics' View)

Critics argue that Trump’s policies undermine the very foundations of American greatness, such as democratic institutions, international alliances, and economic stability.
Economic Risks: Economists warn that sweeping tariffs could lead to higher inflation, slower job growth, and an average cost of $2,400 per year for American households in 2026.
Social and Democratic Concerns: Many view "Make America Great Again" as a regressive slogan that ignores the rights of marginalized groups and threatens to dismantle democratic norms.
International Isolation: Critics contend that withdrawing from international agreements, such as the Paris Climate Accord, and alienating NATO allies turns the U.S. into a "pariah" in world affairs.
Environmental and Scientific Impact: Massive cuts to research and the rollback of environmental regulations are seen by some as long-term threats to American innovation and ecological health.

---

The Subjectivity of "Greatness"

The effectiveness of the "MAGA" agenda often depends on how one defines a "great" era.
Historical Reference: While some associate the slogan with the post-WWII economic boom or the 1980s, others argue it refers to a "mythological past" before modern civil rights or environmental protections existed.
Results-Based Perspective: Trump himself has stated that the ultimate test is not slogans but results, noting that the American people "have to feel it" for the promise to be considered kept.

[枫林晓1]

ai也是瞎支招。

拜登和川普的很多玩意儿。似乎不是他们自己选的。是资本选的。

剩下的也不是他们自己选的。是中国蹿升后，被逼无奈的选择。

[shepherd17]

ai也是瞎支招。

拜登和川普的很多玩意儿。似乎不是他们自己选的。是资本选的。

剩下的也不是他们自己选的。是中国蹿升后，被逼无奈的选择。

可能 AI 只是收集汇总网上已发表的观点，它没有独立思考能力。

设身处地想想，当总统也不容易哇。派 ICE 执法人员抓非法移民，结果一帮屁民跟在后面捣乱。朝中大臣也经常相互攻讦，新政推行处处掣肘。

[枫林晓1]

ice行动只要是合法的行动。民众阻止就是不合适。支持合法国家机器是健康的民主制度的状态体现。

但是暴力过度使用，这一条ice这次估计是跑不了了。

第一次女诗人脑子不够理工。加速启动。足以被当成谋杀意图。

第二例，真看不出受害者有任何机会掏枪，进而有任何意图大杀四方。在非必要暴力使用上，ice估计很难自圆了。

[小河清流]

ice行动只要是合法的行动。民众阻止就是不合适。支持合法国家机器是健康的民主制度的状态体现。

但是暴力过度使用，这一条ice这次估计是跑不了了。

第一次女诗人脑子不够理工。加速启动。足以被当成谋杀意图。

第二例，真看不出受害者有任何机会掏枪，进而有任何意图大杀四方。在非必要暴力使用上，ice估计很难自圆了。

这不好说， 现在看来就是两种情况， 要么ICE看到他有枪，就开枪了，要么看到他掏枪，就开枪。
现在民主党搞暴民政治，真相难辨。

[枫林晓1]

开枪前受害者已经被多名壮汉压制在地了。这一点很难辩驳。时间线上无法自圆。即便随身带枪。即便有被误认为掏枪的行为。也无法解释已经被压制后，为什么不经审判直接枪决。这可是司法中，国家机器可能犯的最大错误。北朝鲜都要经过审判程序，虽然不一定实在。但是也要先审判再炮绝。

[枫林晓1]

只有一种可能。在多人压制在地后。嫌犯依然能够自由伸手实际握住武器并掏出来被人看到。同时，嫌犯使用自己的枪支朝自己连发射数枪。

希望是这样吧。我是支持美国清理国内非法移民和任何非法行为的。法治必须得到维护。

阿弥陀佛。美国能够熬过去。正本清源。