Reddit 在 ChatGPT 引用骤减的原因是 Google

版主: Nimitz

回复
内容
作者
spring
精英
帖子: 5708
注册时间: 2025-02-03
Has thanked: 8 time
Been thanked: 262 time

Reddit 在 ChatGPT 引用骤减的原因是 Google

#1

#1 帖子 spring »


全文转载:

Google just made a subtle but massive change

Last month, Google quietly removed the num=100 search parameter.

This means you can no longer view 100 results at once. The default max is now 10.

Why does this matter?

  • Most LLMs (OpenAI, Perplexity, etc.) rely (directly or indirectly) on Google’s indexed results, alongside their own crawlers.

  • Overnight, their access to the “long tail” of the internet was cut by 90%.

The fallout:

  • According to Search Engine Land, 88% of sites saw a drop in impressions.

  • Reddit, which often ranks in positions 11–100, saw its LLM citations plummet. Its stock dropped 15%.

For startups, this is brutal. Visibility just got harder. Reddit as part of AEO just changed entirely.

It’s no longer enough to build a great product you need to crack distribution first. Because if people can’t discover you, they’ll never get to evaluate you.

Most engineers seem to always neglect this reality, but a mediocre product with great distribution will always beat a great product with mediocre distribution.

As Peter Thiel says:

“Most businesses get zero distribution channels to work: poor sales rather than bad product is the most common cause of failure. If you can get just one distribution channel to work, you have a great business. If you try for several but don’t nail one, you’re finished.

Superior sales and distribution by itself can create a monopoly, even with no product differentiation. The converse is not true. No matter how strong your product — even if it easily fits into already established habits and anybody who tries it likes it immediately — you must still support it with a strong distribution plan."

Distribution > Product

Your God, Not Mine.

spring
精英
帖子: 5708
注册时间: 2025-02-03
Has thanked: 8 time
Been thanked: 262 time

Re: Reddit 在 ChatGPT 引用骤减的原因是 Google

#2

#2 帖子 spring »

https://searchengineland.com/google-num ... ata-462231

77% of sites lost keyword visibility after Google removed num=100

The removal of the num=100 parameter triggered sharp drops in Google Search Console impressions, rankings, and keyword visibility.

Google’s removal of the num=100 parameter is massively reshaping SEO data: 87.7% of sites lost impressions in Google Search Console, according to a new analysis of 319 properties by SEO Tyler Gargula, director of technical SEO at LOCOMOTIVE Agency.

By the numbers.

  • Impressions: 87.7% of sites declined.
  • Query count: 77.6% of sites lost unique ranking terms.
  • Keyword length: Short-tail and mid-tail keywords took the biggest hit.
  • Rank positions: Fewer queries now show on page 3+, while more surface in the top 3 and on page 1 – suggesting rankings now reflect actual positions, without distortion from num=100.

Why we care.
The removal of &num=100 is reshaping how performance is measured, with fewer impressions and keywords making reports look weaker even if rankings hold steady. However, it’s possible some of the Google Search Console data wasn’t real, because rank trackers and scrapers using the 100 page parameter feature were causing an influx of impressions, so now the data is more accurate.

Your God, Not Mine.

牛大春
栋梁
帖子: 16667
注册时间: 2023-12-21
Has thanked: 1041 time
Been thanked: 463 time

Re: Reddit 在 ChatGPT 引用骤减的原因是 Google

#3

#3 帖子 牛大春 »

看来RDDT可以反弹了?

spring 写了: 05 10月 2025, 12:48

https://searchengineland.com/google-num ... ata-462231

77% of sites lost keyword visibility after Google removed num=100

The removal of the num=100 parameter triggered sharp drops in Google Search Console impressions, rankings, and keyword visibility.

Google’s removal of the num=100 parameter is massively reshaping SEO data: 87.7% of sites lost impressions in Google Search Console, according to a new analysis of 319 properties by SEO Tyler Gargula, director of technical SEO at LOCOMOTIVE Agency.

By the numbers.

  • Impressions: 87.7% of sites declined.
  • Query count: 77.6% of sites lost unique ranking terms.
  • Keyword length: Short-tail and mid-tail keywords took the biggest hit.
  • Rank positions: Fewer queries now show on page 3+, while more surface in the top 3 and on page 1 – suggesting rankings now reflect actual positions, without distortion from num=100.

Why we care.
The removal of &num=100 is reshaping how performance is measured, with fewer impressions and keywords making reports look weaker even if rankings hold steady. However, it’s possible some of the Google Search Console data wasn’t real, because rank trackers and scrapers using the 100 page parameter feature were causing an influx of impressions, so now the data is more accurate.

百升飞上天,明月照长安。

回复