版主： resso
完全没有要退出的迹象啊。
Officials with Nikki Haley’s campaign said Monday that she had raised $16.5 million in January, her biggest monthly fund-raising total to date, adding a new infusion of cash to the $14.6 million her campaign brought into the new year to keep the nomination fight with Donald J. Trump going.
牛大春 写了： 05 2月 2024, 11:38完全没有要退出的迹象啊。
Officials with Nikki Haley’s campaign said Monday that she had raised $16.5 million in January, her biggest monthly fund-raising total to date, adding a new infusion of cash to the $14.6 million her campaign brought into the new year to keep the nomination fight with Donald J. Trump going.
这周就是 Nevada 了。不过好像很乱啊，Haley 在周二的 primary，而 Trump 在周四的 caucus，这怎么比？
who 写了： 05 2月 2024, 12:09牛大春 写了： 05 2月 2024, 11:38完全没有要退出的迹象啊。
Officials with Nikki Haley’s campaign said Monday that she had raised $16.5 million in January, her biggest monthly fund-raising total to date, adding a new infusion of cash to the $14.6 million her campaign brought into the new year to keep the nomination fight with Donald J. Trump going.
这周就是 Nevada 了。不过好像很乱啊，Haley 在周二的 primary，而 Trump 在周四的 caucus，这怎么比？
一点都不乱啊，就是要把NV送给主党。 
who 写了： 05 2月 2024, 12:09牛大春 写了： 05 2月 2024, 11:38完全没有要退出的迹象啊。
Officials with Nikki Haley’s campaign said Monday that she had raised $16.5 million in January, her biggest monthly fund-raising total to date, adding a new infusion of cash to the $14.6 million her campaign brought into the new year to keep the nomination fight with Donald J. Trump going.
这周就是 Nevada 了。不过好像很乱啊，Haley 在周二的 primary，而 Trump 在周四的 caucus，这怎么比？
刚刚federal court 裁决川普没有absolute immunity, 现在就等最高院把老川踢出选票
黑莉姑奶奶就可以上了
In the opinion finding that Donald Trump is not immune from prosecution, the three appeals court judges found that if proven, the former president’s efforts to usurp the 2020 presidential election were an "unprecedented assault on the structure of our government."
“It would be a striking paradox if the President, who alone is vested with the constitutional duty to ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,’ were the sole officer capable of defying those laws with impunity,” they wrote.
The judges flatly rejected Trump’s claim that his criminal indictment would have a “chilling effect” on future presidents.
“Moreover, past Presidents have understood themselves to be subject to impeachment and criminal liability, at least under certain circumstances, so the possibility of chilling executive action is already in effect,” they wrote.
很好奇最高法院会怎么判？ 选举前还是选举后判？
