Well, maybe the term "per capita" is not the right one to use when assessing natural disaster, but I believe they do have something similar.
If you add all the deaths due to natural disasters the last hundred years, you can find the risk. However, a powerful quake might wipe out the population of a big city with 1 million, but it kills only one person when it hits a remote area and that person is the only one there. But that does not mean the quake risk is a million times higher in that city than in that remote area. That's why I used the term "per capita". I am sure they adjust appropriately when assessing the risk.
Anyway, if you look at the risk from all natural disasters combined, the West might not have higher than the East.
mi6 写了: ↑21 1月 2024, 16:33
Oh yeah, simple math huh?
- this is the first time I heard somebody using per capita data to assess natural disaster risk.
fortyNiner 写了: ↑21 1月 2024, 16:25
Taking them all into consideration, the West might have lower natural disaster risk per capita than the East.