shepherd17 写了： ↑今天, 08:02标题“黄右”不合适，应该改为“川粉”。黄右 ≠ 川粉
右派中也有反对川普、坚持要求公开爱泼斯坦档案的。
只有某些死忠“川粉”才会罔顾事实、拼死为川总辩护唱赞歌。
天气冷啦，阿毛这才给我们带帽子。
本版黄右来看， 爱泼斯坦邮件里， 9岁女孩是送给谁了？
版主： resso
-
shepherd17
- 精英
- 帖子： 4434
- 注册时间： 2023-12-24
- Has thanked： 765 time
- Been thanked： 670 time
Re: 本版黄右来看， 爱泼斯坦邮件里， 9岁女孩是送给谁了？
who 写了： ↑今天, 08:09shepherd17 写了： ↑今天, 08:02标题“黄右”不合适，应该改为“川粉”。黄右 ≠ 川粉
右派中也有反对川普、坚持要求公开爱泼斯坦档案的。
只有某些死忠“川粉”才会罔顾事实、拼死为川总辩护唱赞歌。
天气冷啦，阿毛这才给我们带帽子。
阿毛以一己之力，单挑群雄，横扫八荒！
Re: 本版黄右来看， 爱泼斯坦邮件里， 9岁女孩是送给谁了？
毛局，专职处理这个事儿。别放过一个坏人。
这真不是开玩笑。罄竹难书的坏人。美国要是处理不好。还会有更罄竹难书的未来。
真的。一定能够要痛下狠手。
上次放过克林顿。是萝莉岛的绝对根源之一。
Re: 本版黄右来看， 爱泼斯坦邮件里， 9岁女孩是送给谁了？
我认为：对伪造AI照片视频的人，处以照片中的人相同的处罚！
如果这张照片是真的，我支持判川普死刑，立即执行！
但假如是伪造的，造谣者也要判死刑，立即执行！
lilyamao这些传谣的，至少也要判无期吧？由美买提监督改造！
—————-///
According to Grok:
This photo is not real—it’s an AI-generated fake image that circulated widely online in early 2026, shortly after the U.S. Department of Justice released a large batch of Jeffrey Epstein-related files in late January 2026.
Fact-checkers like Snopes and Lead Stories (among others) have explicitly debunked this exact type of image (or very similar variants showing Trump and Epstein with children/young people in a casual or bedroom-like setting). Key reasons it’s fake include:
• Classic AI artifacts: Hands are a dead giveaway—Trump’s right hand appears to have only four fingers, while at least one child’s hand shows six fingers or deformed/misshapen structure. Facial details (like one child’s nose blending unnaturally into their face) and other fine elements lack realism.
• Inconsistencies with known facts: The “handwritten” date claims July 7, 1997, but real photos of Epstein from around that time (e.g., Getty Images shots from early 1997) show him with gray/silver hair, not the dark hair here. Lighting, proportions, and overall composition feel off in a way typical of mid-2020s generative AI.
• No credible origin: Reverse-image searches and checks against official Epstein file releases (e.g., DOJ documents) show no match—this never appeared in any authenticated batch. It first popped up on social media (Threads, X, Facebook) around late January/early February 2026, often falsely claimed as “from the Epstein files.”
Real, verified photos of Trump and Epstein together do exist (mostly from the 1990s–early 2000s at events like Mar-a-Lago parties, Trump’s 1993 wedding, or a 1993 Harley-Davidson Cafe opening where Epstein stood near Trump and his young kids Eric & Ivanka). Those are from reputable sources like Getty, CNN archives, etc., and show no bedroom/intimate/family-group setting like this. No authentic images match this bedroom scene with random children.
It’s a fabricated image designed to provoke/shock, likely created with tools like Midjourney or similar around the time of the file dumps to stir controversy. If you see variations (e.g., different crops, added captions, or Polaroid-style borders), they’re almost certainly in the same fake category. Always cross-check viral “explosive” Epstein pics against sites like Snopes or official releases! 
养老型发言 
Re: 本版黄右来看， 爱泼斯坦邮件里， 9岁女孩是送给谁了？
无风不起浪、川粉谣言铺天盖地、大选被偷谣言这个人先应该被五马分尸
加拿大是美国51州？
那川普应该死1万次
dragonfly 写了： ↑今天, 10:50我认为：对伪造AI照片视频的人，处以照片中的人相同的处罚！
如果这张照片是真的，我支持判川普死刑，立即执行！
但假如是伪造的，造谣者也要判死刑，立即执行！
lilyamao这些传谣的，至少也要判无期吧？由美买提监督改造！—————-///
According to Grok:This photo is not real—it’s an AI-generated fake image that circulated widely online in early 2026, shortly after the U.S. Department of Justice released a large batch of Jeffrey Epstein-related files in late January 2026.
Fact-checkers like Snopes and Lead Stories (among others) have explicitly debunked this exact type of image (or very similar variants showing Trump and Epstein with children/young people in a casual or bedroom-like setting). Key reasons it’s fake include:
• Classic AI artifacts: Hands are a dead giveaway—Trump’s right hand appears to have only four fingers, while at least one child’s hand shows six fingers or deformed/misshapen structure. Facial details (like one child’s nose blending unnaturally into their face) and other fine elements lack realism.
• Inconsistencies with known facts: The “handwritten” date claims July 7, 1997, but real photos of Epstein from around that time (e.g., Getty Images shots from early 1997) show him with gray/silver hair, not the dark hair here. Lighting, proportions, and overall composition feel off in a way typical of mid-2020s generative AI.
• No credible origin: Reverse-image searches and checks against official Epstein file releases (e.g., DOJ documents) show no match—this never appeared in any authenticated batch. It first popped up on social media (Threads, X, Facebook) around late January/early February 2026, often falsely claimed as “from the Epstein files.”
Real, verified photos of Trump and Epstein together do exist (mostly from the 1990s–early 2000s at events like Mar-a-Lago parties, Trump’s 1993 wedding, or a 1993 Harley-Davidson Cafe opening where Epstein stood near Trump and his young kids Eric & Ivanka). Those are from reputable sources like Getty, CNN archives, etc., and show no bedroom/intimate/family-group setting like this. No authentic images match this bedroom scene with random children.
It’s a fabricated image designed to provoke/shock, likely created with tools like Midjourney or similar around the time of the file dumps to stir controversy. If you see variations (e.g., different crops, added captions, or Polaroid-style borders), they’re almost certainly in the same fake category. Always cross-check viral “explosive” Epstein pics against sites like Snopes or official releases!
Re: 本版黄右来看， 爱泼斯坦邮件里， 9岁女孩是送给谁了？
要说谣言王，川普第二，没人排第一，什么拜登放进来几千万非法移民，人呢？为啥ICE花了几千亿没找到几个？
都是谣言
大选被偷，谣言
因为是谣言王，IR S有员工看不过川普满嘴为人民、自己偷税漏税，挖国家墙角，公布了川普交税750元的真实信息，川屁要IRS赔100亿讲真话
dragonfly 写了： ↑今天, 10:50我认为：对伪造AI照片视频的人，处以照片中的人相同的处罚！
如果这张照片是真的，我支持判川普死刑，立即执行！
但假如是伪造的，造谣者也要判死刑，立即执行！
lilyamao这些传谣的，至少也要判无期吧？由美买提监督改造！—————-///
According to Grok:This photo is not real—it’s an AI-generated fake image that circulated widely online in early 2026, shortly after the U.S. Department of Justice released a large batch of Jeffrey Epstein-related files in late January 2026.
Fact-checkers like Snopes and Lead Stories (among others) have explicitly debunked this exact type of image (or very similar variants showing Trump and Epstein with children/young people in a casual or bedroom-like setting). Key reasons it’s fake include:
• Classic AI artifacts: Hands are a dead giveaway—Trump’s right hand appears to have only four fingers, while at least one child’s hand shows six fingers or deformed/misshapen structure. Facial details (like one child’s nose blending unnaturally into their face) and other fine elements lack realism.
• Inconsistencies with known facts: The “handwritten” date claims July 7, 1997, but real photos of Epstein from around that time (e.g., Getty Images shots from early 1997) show him with gray/silver hair, not the dark hair here. Lighting, proportions, and overall composition feel off in a way typical of mid-2020s generative AI.
• No credible origin: Reverse-image searches and checks against official Epstein file releases (e.g., DOJ documents) show no match—this never appeared in any authenticated batch. It first popped up on social media (Threads, X, Facebook) around late January/early February 2026, often falsely claimed as “from the Epstein files.”
Real, verified photos of Trump and Epstein together do exist (mostly from the 1990s–early 2000s at events like Mar-a-Lago parties, Trump’s 1993 wedding, or a 1993 Harley-Davidson Cafe opening where Epstein stood near Trump and his young kids Eric & Ivanka). Those are from reputable sources like Getty, CNN archives, etc., and show no bedroom/intimate/family-group setting like this. No authentic images match this bedroom scene with random children.
It’s a fabricated image designed to provoke/shock, likely created with tools like Midjourney or similar around the time of the file dumps to stir controversy. If you see variations (e.g., different crops, added captions, or Polaroid-style borders), they’re almost certainly in the same fake category. Always cross-check viral “explosive” Epstein pics against sites like Snopes or official releases!