美国MITBBS

Analyses of Donald Trump's tax legislation—including the original 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and subsequent extensions or revisions under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)—show that benefits reach most income groups in raw dollar or percentage terms, but are heavily skewed toward high-income earners and the top 1% . [1, 2, 3]
High-Income Earners (Top 1% to Top 20%)

• Top 1% of Earners: Receive the largest share of overall net tax relief in absolute dollar amounts. Analyses show that the top 1% capture a substantial portion (ranging up to 45% depending on the specific legislative package provisions) of the total net tax cuts, averaging tens of thousands to over $60,000 per year in direct tax reductions.
• Top 20% (Upper-Income): Receive roughly 60% of the total tax cut benefits. Upper-middle and high-income brackets benefit significantly from lower individual marginal income tax rates, pass-through business deduction rules, and changes to estate and alternative minimum taxes. [1, 3, 5]

Middle-Income Earners

• Middle 20%: Receive modest average tax cuts (often estimated around $1,000 to $1,800 in direct tax relief during initial implementation years).
• Primary Drivers: Middle-class households benefit primarily from the doubled standard deduction, lower individual tax rate brackets, and expansions to provisions like the Child Tax Credit. However, when broader economic policies or accompanying federal spending reductions (such as cuts to health care subsidies or public assistance programs) are factored in by independent modelers, the net resource gains for middle-income households narrow significantly or turn slightly negative over time. [3, 7, 8, 9]

Low-Income Earners (Bottom 20% to Bottom 40%)

• Direct Tax Impact: Low-income households receive the smallest direct tax cuts in dollar terms—often averaging under $160 to $250 annually—because many already have little or no federal income tax liability.
• Net Overall Effect: Nonpartisan and academic scorecards (such as the Congressional Budget Office and the Tax Policy Center) indicate that when combined with concurrent spending cuts to federal safety-net programs (like Medicaid or SNAP) or changes to health credit expansions, the lowest-income quintiles often face a net negative economic impact or potential tax increases relative to expiring provisions. [1, 4, 7, 11]

Would you like to explore how these tax provisions affect a specific income bracket or look into the impact on business pass-through deductions versus individual income brackets?
AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/hous ... households
[2] 
[3] https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/ ... -tax-cuts/
[4] https://itep.org/tax-provisions-in-trum ... estimates/
[5] https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... -the-rich/
[6] https://www.wxii12.com/article/big-beau ... t/65210214
[7] https://democrats-budget.house.gov/reso ... ultra-rich
[8] https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... 1-percent/
[9] https://www.hrblock.com/tax-center/irs/ ... ill-taxes/
[10] https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-t ... and-leaves
[11] 

你引用的文章中提到，减税的大头都在最富超富， 单单 top 1% 就享受了减税的 45%。

小河清流 写了： 今天, 10:37

Analyses of Donald Trump's tax legislation—including the original 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and subsequent extensions or revisions under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)—show that benefits reach most income groups in raw dollar or percentage terms, but are heavily skewed toward high-income earners and the top 1% . [1, 2, 3]
High-Income Earners (Top 1% to Top 20%)

• Top 1% of Earners: Receive the largest share of overall net tax relief in absolute dollar amounts. Analyses show that the top 1% capture a substantial portion (ranging up to 45% depending on the specific legislative package provisions) of the total net tax cuts, averaging tens of thousands to over $60,000 per year in direct tax reductions.
• Top 20% (Upper-Income): Receive roughly 60% of the total tax cut benefits. Upper-middle and high-income brackets benefit significantly from lower individual marginal income tax rates, pass-through business deduction rules, and changes to estate and alternative minimum taxes. [1, 3, 5]

Middle-Income Earners

• Middle 20%: Receive modest average tax cuts (often estimated around $1,000 to $1,800 in direct tax relief during initial implementation years).
• Primary Drivers: Middle-class households benefit primarily from the doubled standard deduction, lower individual tax rate brackets, and expansions to provisions like the Child Tax Credit. However, when broader economic policies or accompanying federal spending reductions (such as cuts to health care subsidies or public assistance programs) are factored in by independent modelers, the net resource gains for middle-income households narrow significantly or turn slightly negative over time. [3, 7, 8, 9]

Low-Income Earners (Bottom 20% to Bottom 40%)

• Direct Tax Impact: Low-income households receive the smallest direct tax cuts in dollar terms—often averaging under $160 to $250 annually—because many already have little or no federal income tax liability.
• Net Overall Effect: Nonpartisan and academic scorecards (such as the Congressional Budget Office and the Tax Policy Center) indicate that when combined with concurrent spending cuts to federal safety-net programs (like Medicaid or SNAP) or changes to health credit expansions, the lowest-income quintiles often face a net negative economic impact or potential tax increases relative to expiring provisions. [1, 4, 7, 11]

Would you like to explore how these tax provisions affect a specific income bracket or look into the impact on business pass-through deductions versus individual income brackets?
AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/hous ... households
[2] 
[3] https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/ ... -tax-cuts/
[4] https://itep.org/tax-provisions-in-trum ... estimates/
[5] https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... -the-rich/
[6] https://www.wxii12.com/article/big-beau ... t/65210214
[7] https://democrats-budget.house.gov/reso ... ultra-rich
[8] https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... 1-percent/
[9] https://www.hrblock.com/tax-center/irs/ ... ill-taxes/
[10] https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-t ... and-leaves
[11] 

小河清流 写了： 今天, 10:37

Analyses of Donald Trump's tax legislation—including the original 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and subsequent extensions or revisions under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)—show that benefits reach most income groups in raw dollar or percentage terms, but are heavily skewed toward high-income earners and the top 1% . [1, 2, 3]
High-Income Earners (Top 1% to Top 20%)

• Top 1% of Earners: Receive the largest share of overall net tax relief in absolute dollar amounts. Analyses show that the top 1% capture a substantial portion (ranging up to 45% depending on the specific legislative package provisions) of the total net tax cuts, averaging tens of thousands to over $60,000 per year in direct tax reductions.
• Top 20% (Upper-Income): Receive roughly 60% of the total tax cut benefits. Upper-middle and high-income brackets benefit significantly from lower individual marginal income tax rates, pass-through business deduction rules, and changes to estate and alternative minimum taxes. [1, 3, 5]

Middle-Income Earners

• Middle 20%: Receive modest average tax cuts (often estimated around $1,000 to $1,800 in direct tax relief during initial implementation years).
• Primary Drivers: Middle-class households benefit primarily from the doubled standard deduction, lower individual tax rate brackets, and expansions to provisions like the Child Tax Credit. However, when broader economic policies or accompanying federal spending reductions (such as cuts to health care subsidies or public assistance programs) are factored in by independent modelers, the net resource gains for middle-income households narrow significantly or turn slightly negative over time. [3, 7, 8, 9]

Low-Income Earners (Bottom 20% to Bottom 40%)

• Direct Tax Impact: Low-income households receive the smallest direct tax cuts in dollar terms—often averaging under $160 to $250 annually—because many already have little or no federal income tax liability.
• Net Overall Effect: Nonpartisan and academic scorecards (such as the Congressional Budget Office and the Tax Policy Center) indicate that when combined with concurrent spending cuts to federal safety-net programs (like Medicaid or SNAP) or changes to health credit expansions, the lowest-income quintiles often face a net negative economic impact or potential tax increases relative to expiring provisions. [1, 4, 7, 11]

Would you like to explore how these tax provisions affect a specific income bracket or look into the impact on business pass-through deductions versus individual income brackets?
AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/hous ... households
[2] 
[3] https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/ ... -tax-cuts/
[4] https://itep.org/tax-provisions-in-trum ... estimates/
[5] https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... -the-rich/
[6] https://www.wxii12.com/article/big-beau ... t/65210214
[7] https://democrats-budget.house.gov/reso ... ultra-rich
[8] https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... 1-percent/
[9] https://www.hrblock.com/tax-center/irs/ ... ill-taxes/
[10] https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-t ... and-leaves
[11] 

中低收入对通胀更敏感

crane 写了： 今天, 11:16

你引用的文章中提到，减税的大头都在最富超富， 单单 top 1% 就享受了减税的 45%。

小河清流 写了： 今天, 10:37

Analyses of Donald Trump's tax legislation—including the original 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and subsequent extensions or revisions under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)—show that benefits reach most income groups in raw dollar or percentage terms, but are heavily skewed toward high-income earners and the top 1% . [1, 2, 3]
High-Income Earners (Top 1% to Top 20%)

• Top 1% of Earners: Receive the largest share of overall net tax relief in absolute dollar amounts. Analyses show that the top 1% capture a substantial portion (ranging up to 45% depending on the specific legislative package provisions) of the total net tax cuts, averaging tens of thousands to over $60,000 per year in direct tax reductions.
• Top 20% (Upper-Income): Receive roughly 60% of the total tax cut benefits. Upper-middle and high-income brackets benefit significantly from lower individual marginal income tax rates, pass-through business deduction rules, and changes to estate and alternative minimum taxes. [1, 3, 5]

Middle-Income Earners

• Middle 20%: Receive modest average tax cuts (often estimated around $1,000 to $1,800 in direct tax relief during initial implementation years).
• Primary Drivers: Middle-class households benefit primarily from the doubled standard deduction, lower individual tax rate brackets, and expansions to provisions like the Child Tax Credit. However, when broader economic policies or accompanying federal spending reductions (such as cuts to health care subsidies or public assistance programs) are factored in by independent modelers, the net resource gains for middle-income households narrow significantly or turn slightly negative over time. [3, 7, 8, 9]

Low-Income Earners (Bottom 20% to Bottom 40%)

• Direct Tax Impact: Low-income households receive the smallest direct tax cuts in dollar terms—often averaging under $160 to $250 annually—because many already have little or no federal income tax liability.
• Net Overall Effect: Nonpartisan and academic scorecards (such as the Congressional Budget Office and the Tax Policy Center) indicate that when combined with concurrent spending cuts to federal safety-net programs (like Medicaid or SNAP) or changes to health credit expansions, the lowest-income quintiles often face a net negative economic impact or potential tax increases relative to expiring provisions. [1, 4, 7, 11]

Would you like to explore how these tax provisions affect a specific income bracket or look into the impact on business pass-through deductions versus individual income brackets?
AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/hous ... households
[2] 
[3] https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/ ... -tax-cuts/
[4] https://itep.org/tax-provisions-in-trum ... estimates/
[5] https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... -the-rich/
[6] https://www.wxii12.com/article/big-beau ... t/65210214
[7] https://democrats-budget.house.gov/reso ... ultra-rich
[8] https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... 1-percent/
[9] https://www.hrblock.com/tax-center/irs/ ... ill-taxes/
[10] https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-t ... and-leaves
[11] 

当然%1交的税多绝对数字肯定也多， The top 1% of earners in the United States paid 38.4% of all federal individual income taxes in recent IRS data (Tax Year 2023), while earning 20.6% of the nation's total adjusted gross income.

crane 写了： 今天, 11:16

你引用的文章中提到，减税的大头都在最富超富， 单单 top 1% 就享受了减税的 45%。

小河清流 写了： 今天, 10:37

Analyses of Donald Trump's tax legislation—including the original 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and subsequent extensions or revisions under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)—show that benefits reach most income groups in raw dollar or percentage terms, but are heavily skewed toward high-income earners and the top 1% . [1, 2, 3]
High-Income Earners (Top 1% to Top 20%)

• Top 1% of Earners: Receive the largest share of overall net tax relief in absolute dollar amounts. Analyses show that the top 1% capture a substantial portion (ranging up to 45% depending on the specific legislative package provisions) of the total net tax cuts, averaging tens of thousands to over $60,000 per year in direct tax reductions.
• Top 20% (Upper-Income): Receive roughly 60% of the total tax cut benefits. Upper-middle and high-income brackets benefit significantly from lower individual marginal income tax rates, pass-through business deduction rules, and changes to estate and alternative minimum taxes. [1, 3, 5]

Middle-Income Earners

• Middle 20%: Receive modest average tax cuts (often estimated around $1,000 to $1,800 in direct tax relief during initial implementation years).
• Primary Drivers: Middle-class households benefit primarily from the doubled standard deduction, lower individual tax rate brackets, and expansions to provisions like the Child Tax Credit. However, when broader economic policies or accompanying federal spending reductions (such as cuts to health care subsidies or public assistance programs) are factored in by independent modelers, the net resource gains for middle-income households narrow significantly or turn slightly negative over time. [3, 7, 8, 9]

Low-Income Earners (Bottom 20% to Bottom 40%)

• Direct Tax Impact: Low-income households receive the smallest direct tax cuts in dollar terms—often averaging under $160 to $250 annually—because many already have little or no federal income tax liability.
• Net Overall Effect: Nonpartisan and academic scorecards (such as the Congressional Budget Office and the Tax Policy Center) indicate that when combined with concurrent spending cuts to federal safety-net programs (like Medicaid or SNAP) or changes to health credit expansions, the lowest-income quintiles often face a net negative economic impact or potential tax increases relative to expiring provisions. [1, 4, 7, 11]

Would you like to explore how these tax provisions affect a specific income bracket or look into the impact on business pass-through deductions versus individual income brackets?
AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/hous ... households
[2] 
[3] https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/ ... -tax-cuts/
[4] https://itep.org/tax-provisions-in-trum ... estimates/
[5] https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... -the-rich/
[6] https://www.wxii12.com/article/big-beau ... t/65210214
[7] https://democrats-budget.house.gov/reso ... ultra-rich
[8] https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... 1-percent/
[9] https://www.hrblock.com/tax-center/irs/ ... ill-taxes/
[10] https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-t ... and-leaves
[11] 

拜主席任内通胀最高。

两党的政策都缺乏远见：
国富民强 需要国家长期大量投入教育科研，基建。

现在米国还在吃二战后的三十年左右国家投入的红利。

小河清流 写了： 今天, 12:33

crane 写了： 今天, 11:16

你引用的文章中提到，减税的大头都在最富超富， 单单 top 1% 就享受了减税的 45%。

拜主席任内通胀最高。

那是几乎所有人都不工作的疫情时期

他们占了资产的90%吧

而且富人的资产是利滚利、本来钱得来就好不费工夫。他们凭啥还比W2人交更少的税？

小河清流 写了： 今天, 12:32

crane 写了： 今天, 11:16

你引用的文章中提到，减税的大头都在最富超富， 单单 top 1% 就享受了减税的 45%。

当然%1交的税多绝对数字肯定也多， The top 1% of earners in the United States paid 38.4% of all federal individual income taxes in recent IRS data (Tax Year 2023), while earning 20.6% of the nation's total adjusted gross income.

Lilyamao 写了： 今天, 15:51

他们占了资产的90%吧

而且富人的资产是利滚利、本来钱得来就好不费工夫。他们凭啥还比W2人交更少的税？

小河清流 写了： 今天, 12:32

当然%1交的税多绝对数字肯定也多， The top 1% of earners in the United States paid 38.4% of all federal individual income taxes in recent IRS data (Tax Year 2023), while earning 20.6% of the nation's total adjusted gross income.

那是因为巨富可以逃税，10% 到01%实际交得也不少。你像热搜等人中等收入得，平均国税不过10%其实税率更低。

ssgo 写了： 今天, 17:08

Lilyamao 写了： 今天, 15:51

他们占了资产的90%吧

而且富人的资产是利滚利、本来钱得来就好不费工夫。他们凭啥还比W2人交更少的税？

那是因为巨富可以逃税，10% 到01%实际交得也不少。你像热搜等人中等收入得，平均国税不过10%其实税率更低。

你狗屁，啥中等收入联邦税10%了？