从这个角度看，ICE开枪一点儿问题没有
发表于 ： 07 1月 2026, 15:25
车前的ICE直接被撞出去了，显然受伤了。但主媒采用的是另一个角度的视频，看上去ICE只是被轻轻蹭了一下。
车前的ICE直接被撞出去了，显然受伤了。但主媒采用的是另一个角度的视频，看上去ICE只是被轻轻蹭了一下。
冲动是魔鬼啊，抓了又不能怎么样，没必要这么跑。
有人总结了一些相关的过往判例。看来需要更高清的视频证据。
Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): “Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.”
Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): “A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.”
Cordova vs Aragon (2009): “Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.”
Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): “a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.”
这事儿最大的受益者是Walz老小子，抓住一颗救命稻草。早知就不会宣布退选了。
那就和川普一样不要脸了
你这个不清楚，下面这个清楚：
是站在车左前方的开的枪。14秒处掏枪，车正在向前，但是车轮是一直向右打的，对持枪人来说是有威胁因为他的感觉就是车冲着他来的。不因该从车前过啊。两边都是悲剧。司机是个白女所以没有种族歧视这一说，否则更加了。
最明显的两课：
那帮人下车冲那个白女去，明显就是不善，白牛也是想跑没跑了。
这就是变相要杀人，和伊朗那个革命卫队也没差