尽量找出相关新闻(及其链接),网图容易被误导。
Yahoo News 把他的每一句话都说出来了,川粉还不承认?
川普说大选他输掉就是被偷、他赢了就是公正、这种弱智都骗不了的话、骗了几千万川粉
而且川普每抛出一个证据;都被事实和数据打脸、最高院六个保守法官、还是每次9:0 否决了川普40多个诬陷大选被偷的官司
这个提供的证据、有视频有数据有证人有最高法院判决、川粉也不信啊
川粉就是你的论据里的鸡蛋挑骨头、他自己的骨头里检测出鸡蛋一个细胞都是鸡蛋
我对美国的川粉已经不抱任何说服他们的希望
再者,愚蠢的言论不等于煽动仇恨。不要混淆两者的区别。
这个是他的原文:
CHARLIE KIRK (HOST): Why is the Republican Party, why is the conservative movement to blame for gay schizophrenic nudists that are hemp jewelry makers breaking into somebody's home -- or maybe not breaking into somebody's home? Why are we to blame for that exactly? And why is he still in jail? Why has he not been bailed out?
By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out. I bet bail's like 30 or 40 thousand bucks. Bail him out and then go ask him some questions.
I wonder what his bail is. They're going after him with attempted murder, political assassination, all of this stuff. I'm not qualifying it. I think it's awful. It's not right. But why is it that in Chicago you're able to commit murder and be out the next day? Why is that you're able to trespass, second degree murder, arson, threaten a public official, cashless bail -- this happens all over San Francisco. But if you go after the Pelosis, oh, you're let out immediately. Got it.
And, by the way, why is it that the media hasn't mentioned that they're all these, allegedly, far right websites that popped up attributed to him and then they were taken down a few days later? Who's to blame for that exactly? By the way, as soon as I read those far right websites that were supposedly attributed to him, I told my team, this is so fake. This is written as if it's a leftist trying to make it seem as if it was somebody on the right. It just seems so artificial.