分页: 3 / 3

Re: 共和党吸引低- IQ voters

发表于 : 16 3月 2024, 19:05
fortyNiner

What is my analysis method?
I used data you provided.
What's wrong with my method?
In your previous post, you doubted the data you provided, now you are redirecting to my method?

小河清流 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:04
fortyNiner 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:01

Then why did you provide your source since you don't trust it?

I point out you analysis method is invalid, so the result is not reliable.


Re: 共和党吸引低- IQ voters

发表于 : 16 3月 2024, 19:10
小河清流
fortyNiner 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:05

What is my analysis method?
I used data you provided.
What's wrong with my method?
In your previous post, you doubted the data you provided, now you are redirecting to my method?

小河清流 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:04

I point out you analysis method is invalid, so the result is not reliable.

For example, data did not include illegal immigrant which most in the southwest , poverty level , blue/red populate within states, all those can be factors.


Re: 共和党吸引低- IQ voters

发表于 : 16 3月 2024, 19:12
fortyNiner

So you are saying the data you provided are flawed? Then why did you use it to try to refute me?
If it turned out that your data supported your claim, would you still stand with it?

小河清流 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:10
fortyNiner 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:05

What is my analysis method?
I used data you provided.
What's wrong with my method?
In your previous post, you doubted the data you provided, now you are redirecting to my method?

For example, data did not include illegal immigrant which most in the southwest , poverty level , blue/red populate within states, all those can be factors.


Re: 共和党吸引低- IQ voters

发表于 : 16 3月 2024, 19:16
小河清流

I said your interpretation is flawed. I only said the data doesn't support your conclusion.


Re: 共和党吸引低- IQ voters

发表于 : 16 3月 2024, 19:20
fortyNiner

What's wrong with my interpretation?
Multiple each state's rate to its population, add them up, then divide the sum by the total population. That gives you the overall average of each group of states. What's wrong with it?
You are not consistent. In some posts, you said my interpretation/analysis was flawed. In some other, you said the data was not completed. What exactly did you mean?

小河清流 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:16

I said your interpretation is flawed. I only said the data doesn't support your conclusion.


Re: 共和党吸引低- IQ voters

发表于 : 16 3月 2024, 19:32
小河清流
fortyNiner 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:20

What's wrong with my interpretation?
Multiple each state's rate to its population, add them up, then divide the sum by the total population. That gives you the overall average of each group of states. What's wrong with it?
You are not consistent. In some posts, you said my interpretation/analysis was flawed. In some other, you said the data was not completed. What exactly did you mean?

小河清流 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:16

I said your interpretation is flawed. I only said the data doesn't support your conclusion.

you make a statement , your slice the data , you have to proof it , complete it . my data don't need slice , shows blue is on top. I don't need to lecture you on scientific method, right?


Re: 共和党吸引低- IQ voters

发表于 : 16 3月 2024, 19:41
fortyNiner

We are talking about the overall average. I never deny that there are many shithole cities in blue states, Cal included. It's also possible that the most shithole places are in blue states. I am not talking about this in this thread. I am talking that on average, red states have higher crime rate, which is supported by the data you provided.
Using YOUR data, I showed that red states have 8% higher crime rates. And then you said the data is invalid because it might be incomplete? If you are able to, show how my analysis is flawed, instaed of just "I don't need to lecture you on scientific method".

小河清流 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:32
fortyNiner 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:20

What's wrong with my interpretation?
Multiple each state's rate to its population, add them up, then divide the sum by the total population. That gives you the overall average of each group of states. What's wrong with it?
You are not consistent. In some posts, you said my interpretation/analysis was flawed. In some other, you said the data was not completed. What exactly did you mean?

you make a statement , your slice the data , you have to proof it , complete it . my data don't need slice , shows blue is on top. I don't need to lecture you on scientific method, right?


Re: 共和党吸引低- IQ voters

发表于 : 16 3月 2024, 19:53
小河清流

once you slice the data , YOU NEED to provide more data to support your conclusion. I can play the game all day long and lead to a slice that support my view point.


Re: 共和党吸引低- IQ voters

发表于 : 17 3月 2024, 02:32
fortyNiner

Slice data? What did I do to slice data?
I used every single bit of the data you provided.

小河清流 写了: 16 3月 2024, 19:53

once you slice the data , YOU NEED to provide more data to support your conclusion. I can play the game all day long and lead to a slice that support my view point.