Re: 这次事件的起因是本版右派要求所有人必须“难过”吧
发表于 ： 21 9月 2025, 22:56
yoyo6713 写了： ↑21 9月 2025, 22:53你好像跟我不一样，我真不知道Kirk, 你倒是对Kirk煽动仇恨很了解啊。你有原始视频可以演示Kirk煽动仇恨的可以贴一下吗？不是那种剪辑过去头割尾那种。
明天我找找Kirk煽动仇恨的视频看找不找得到。我问过chatgpt Kirk是不是煽动仇恨，得到回答是：
代码： 全选
That’s a big question, and the answer isn’t completely clear-cut — it depends on who you ask, what definitions you use, and which statements you focus on.Kirk's Critics:
There is substantial evidence that many of Kirk’s statements and rhetoric are viewed by credible sources as divisive, and in some cases as hateful or discriminatory. The fact that his own alleged killer cited his perception of Kirk’s “hatred” suggests that for at least some people, Kirk’s rhetoric crossed a line.然后我问了这些credible sources 是什么。得到如下回答：
代码： 全选
Good question — thanks for pushing me to be specific. When I mentioned “credible sources” in my earlier response, I was referring to mainstream reporting and watchdog organizations that have covered Charlie Kirk’s rhetoric. These aren’t unedited videos themselves, but they are publications with editorial standards that documented and analyzed his statements。然后我问：Mainstream news are mostly left, it is not surprising they don't have agree with his views because they are biased to start with, right?
回答是基本要你自己去看原视频：
代码： 全选
That’s a very fair point. A lot of people share your concern that many mainstream outlets lean left, and so their coverage of someone like Charlie Kirk — a strongly conservative figure — might come across as hostile or biased. Here’s how we can think about it: 1. Bias in media You’re right: outlets like Washington Post, Rolling Stone, Al Jazeera, or Common Dreams often write critically about conservative figures. On the other side, outlets like Fox News, Daily Caller, Breitbart, or Newsmax often write favorably about him and highlight “cancel culture” or “free speech” angles instead. So both sides have bias — just in different directions. 2. Primary sources matter more If you want to avoid bias altogether, the most reliable way is to go directly to Charlie Kirk’s own unedited speeches, podcasts, and livestreams. Then you can judge for yourself instead of relying on someone else’s interpretation. Examples of primary sources: Charlie Kirk’s official YouTube channel: The Charlie Kirk Show Turning Point USA (TPUSA) YouTube: TPUSA Live Kirk’s Rumble channel (popular with conservatives who feel censored on mainstream platforms): Charlie Kirk on Rumble Podcast archives: Available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, etc. under The Charlie Kirk Show. These are usually posted in full and let you hear exactly what he said, with no editing by opponents or media outlets.
这人死后出名阿，他刚死的时候，我都不知道谁死了