Harris 反对 日本钢铁 140亿 收购美国钢铁 的计划

版主: Nimitzkc130

回复
内容
作者
头像
who
精英
帖子: 7548
注册时间: 2023-12-22
Has thanked: 67 time
Been thanked: 365 time

Harris 反对 日本钢铁 140亿 收购美国钢铁 的计划

#1

#1 帖子 who »

2023年12月18日,日本制铁宣布以141亿美元的价格全资收购美国钢铁。
https://apnews.com/article/us-steel-nip ... 9172a3bd6b

Harris opposes US Steel’s sale to Japan’s Nippon Steel
https://apnews.com/article/harris-biden ... 5c1f60d5fa

“U.S. Steel should remain American-owned and American-operated, and I will always have the backs of America’s steelworkers,” she said. That echoes Biden, who repeated Monday what he’s said since March — that he opposes U.S. Steel’s would-be sale to Nippon, believing it would hurt the country’s steelworkers. It also overlaps with Republican former President Donald Trump.

牛大春
精英
帖子: 8764
注册时间: 2023-12-21
Has thanked: 847 time
Been thanked: 256 time

Re: Harris 反对 日本钢铁 140亿 收购美国钢铁 的计划

#2

#2 帖子 牛大春 »

这种事情总统有否决权吧?

君独守孤城而西方无救,恐终不能全。何不降耶?

头像
who
精英
帖子: 7548
注册时间: 2023-12-22
Has thanked: 67 time
Been thanked: 365 time

Re: Harris 反对 日本钢铁 140亿 收购美国钢铁 的计划

#3

#3 帖子 who »

牛大春 写了: 02 9月 2024, 21:34

这种事情总统有否决权吧?

不知道,刚刚问了一下:

The U.S. President could potentially intervene in the sale of U.S. Steel's joint venture to Japan's Nippon Steel, but it would depend on several factors. Here's how:

  1. National Security Concerns: If the sale is deemed a threat to national security, the President could block or modify the deal through the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). CFIUS reviews transactions that could result in foreign control of U.S. businesses to assess potential national security risks.

  2. Legislative Action: The President could work with Congress to pass legislation that might block or impose conditions on the sale. This would be more complex and time-consuming, requiring sufficient political support.

  3. Public Pressure: The President could use the platform of the presidency to publicly oppose the sale, potentially influencing the involved parties to reconsider or prompting regulatory bodies to take a closer look.

However, the decision would typically involve significant legal and diplomatic considerations, and such interventions are relatively rare.

回复