RDDT 又跳水了

版主: Nimitz

回复
内容
作者
spring
精英
帖子: 6447
注册时间: 2025-02-03
Has thanked: 8 time
Been thanked: 286 time

RDDT 又跳水了

#1

#1 帖子 spring »

今天盘前刚刚买进。。。

缘聚缘散,好聚好散。

spring
精英
帖子: 6447
注册时间: 2025-02-03
Has thanked: 8 time
Been thanked: 286 time

Re: RDDT 又跳水了

#2

#2 帖子 spring »

spring 写了: 15 1月 2026, 13:29

今天盘前刚刚买进。。。

HOOD 今天也跳水,惨惨惨。

缘聚缘散,好聚好散。

牛大春
栋梁
帖子: 18443
注册时间: 2023-12-21
Has thanked: 1024 time
Been thanked: 495 time

Re: RDDT 又跳水了

#3

#3 帖子 牛大春 »

spring 写了: 15 1月 2026, 13:29

今天盘前刚刚买进。。。

看新闻说竞争对手出现了?

陛下,您设计的军舰威力无比、坚固异常并且十分美丽,堪称空前绝后。它能开出前所未有的高速度,它的武器将是世上最强的。舰内设施将使从舰长到见习水手的全部乘员都会感到舒适无比。这艘辉煌的战舰看起来只有一个缺点:只要它一下水,就会立刻沉入海底,如同铅铸的鸭子一般。

spring
精英
帖子: 6447
注册时间: 2025-02-03
Has thanked: 8 time
Been thanked: 286 time

Re: RDDT 又跳水了

#4

#4 帖子 spring »

牛大春 写了: 15 1月 2026, 14:37
spring 写了: 15 1月 2026, 13:29

今天盘前刚刚买进。。。

看新闻说竞争对手出现了?

砸锅卖铁上了,不知道要装死多长时间。

缘聚缘散,好聚好散。

spring
精英
帖子: 6447
注册时间: 2025-02-03
Has thanked: 8 time
Been thanked: 286 time

Re: RDDT 又跳水了

#5

#5 帖子 spring »

Reddit

Reddit (RDDT) stock slumped Thursday after RBC Capital Markets said it received mixed feedback from ad agencies about the company's advertising performance.

In a client note, RBC analyst Brad Erickson said check-ins with small- and medium-sized business ad agencies were positive for digital advertising leaders Meta Platforms (META) and Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL). But the picture for Reddit was more mixed, Erickson said.

For Reddit, "feedback was challenging," Erickson wrote. "Inexpensive CPMs (cost-per-mille, or 1,000 impressions) generally matching up with conversion levels with small/less well-known brands seeing relatively lower performance. Recognition of Reddit's importance for large language model discovery remains but we found instances where ROI (return on investment) for organically building a presence — by a person — viewed as higher than ad spend."

Erickson said he expects upside to Reddit's estimates but cautioned that "much is expected" and a renewal of the company's AI licensing deal with Google is not likely until 2027. Meanwhile, Erickson noted that an AI-powered Max Campaign offering for advertisers on Reddit is still in "early days." Erickson rates Reddit stock as market perform, or neutral

缘聚缘散,好聚好散。

spring
精英
帖子: 6447
注册时间: 2025-02-03
Has thanked: 8 time
Been thanked: 286 time

Re: RDDT 又跳水了

#6

#6 帖子 spring »

spring 写了: 15 1月 2026, 13:31
spring 写了: 15 1月 2026, 13:29

今天盘前刚刚买进。。。

HOOD 今天也跳水,惨惨惨。

新闻报道 HOOD大跌和这个有关
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/coinbase ... 12953.html
US Senate committee delays crypto bill after opposition from Coinbase CEO

Jan 15 (Reuters) - A U.S. Senate committee postponed a long-awaited Thursday debate on a landmark bill that would create a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies hours after the CEO of Coinbase said the crypto giant would not support the measure, raising uncertainty about ​its future.

The legislation, unveiled on Monday by the Senate Banking Committee, would define when crypto tokens are securities, commodities or fall into other categories. ‌It would also clarify the jurisdiction of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over the sector.

The bill is the culmination of a years-long lobbying campaign led by Coinbase and other big crypto companies which ‌have argued the industry needs fresh regulation to provide legal clarity that would ultimately promote digital asset adoption. The CEO of Coinbase, however, now says he is bothered by certain aspects of the latest effort to craft new rules.

Former President Joe Biden's regulators alleged many crypto companies were flouting U.S. securities laws and other rules, but the industry says existing rules are not appropriate for digital assets.

The Senate Banking Committee was scheduled to debate amendments to the bill, dubbed the Clarity Act, on Thursday. But it canceled that so-called ⁠markup late on Wednesday, after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said ‌on X that the bill had "too many issues" and that the company could not support it, in a major blow for the legislation.

缘聚缘散,好聚好散。

spring
精英
帖子: 6447
注册时间: 2025-02-03
Has thanked: 8 time
Been thanked: 286 time

Re: RDDT 又跳水了

#7

#7 帖子 spring »

spring 写了: 15 1月 2026, 21:57
spring 写了: 15 1月 2026, 13:31

HOOD 今天也跳水,惨惨惨。

新闻报道 HOOD大跌和这个有关
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/coinbase ... 12953.html
US Senate committee delays crypto bill after opposition from Coinbase CEO

Jan 15 (Reuters) - A U.S. Senate committee postponed a long-awaited Thursday debate on a landmark bill that would create a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies hours after the CEO of Coinbase said the crypto giant would not support the measure, raising uncertainty about ​its future.

The legislation, unveiled on Monday by the Senate Banking Committee, would define when crypto tokens are securities, commodities or fall into other categories. ‌It would also clarify the jurisdiction of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over the sector.

The bill is the culmination of a years-long lobbying campaign led by Coinbase and other big crypto companies which ‌have argued the industry needs fresh regulation to provide legal clarity that would ultimately promote digital asset adoption. The CEO of Coinbase, however, now says he is bothered by certain aspects of the latest effort to craft new rules.

Former President Joe Biden's regulators alleged many crypto companies were flouting U.S. securities laws and other rules, but the industry says existing rules are not appropriate for digital assets.

The Senate Banking Committee was scheduled to debate amendments to the bill, dubbed the Clarity Act, on Thursday. But it canceled that so-called ⁠markup late on Wednesday, after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said ‌on X that the bill had "too many issues" and that the company could not support it, in a major blow for the legislation.

https://x.com/brian_armstrong/status/20 ... 7105355865

Brian Armstrong
4:05 PM · Jan 14, 2026

After reviewing the Senate Banking draft text over the last 48hrs, Coinbase unfortunately can’t support the bill as written.

There are too many issues, including:

  • A defacto ban on tokenized equities
  • DeFi prohibitions, giving the government unlimited access to your financial records and removing your right to privacy
  • Erosion of the CFTC’s authority, stifling innovation and making it subservient to the SEC
  • Draft amendments that would kill rewards on stablecoins, allowing banks to ban their competition

We appreciate all the hard work by members of the Senate to reach a bi-partisan outcome, but this version would be materially worse than the current status quo. We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill. Hopefully we can all get to a better draft.

We'll keep fighting for all Americans and for economic freedom. Crypto needs to be treated on a level playing field with the rest of financial services so we can build this industry in a safe and trusted way in America.

缘聚缘散,好聚好散。

回复